Ann Hopkins Essay -- essays research papers fc

Legal Analysis ModelThe relevant facts      jibe to the case, Ann Hopkins had worked successfully for Price Waterhouse since 1978 and was nominated for partner in crimeship at Price Waterhouse in 1982. (p. 1) Out of 88 candidates she was the only woman. In the admissions process, forms were sent out to tot onlyy Price Waterhouse partners of whom there were 662. These partners then submitted their comments about the candidates. . Only thirty- dickens partners, all male, responded about Hopkins. (p. 5) The forms were then tabulated to achieve a statistical rating in order to determine if the candidate should be admitted to the partnership. Of the 88 candidates Price Waterhouse offered partnerships to 47 of them, rejected 21, and placed 20, including Hopkins, on hold. (p. 1) Some candidates had been held because of concerns about their interpersonal skills. the insurance policy Board takes evaluations or a negative reaction on this substructure very seriously, e ven if the negative comments on short form evaluations were found upon less contact with the candidate than glowing reports on long forms evaluations ground on more extensive contact. The policy board had however, recommended and elected two candidates "criticized for their interpersonal skills. (p. 4) Approximately 1% of the 662 partners were women. Price Waterhouse gave two explanations for this. One was the comparatively recent entry of large numbers of women into accounting and related fields. The former(a) was the success of clients and rival accounting firms in hiring away female authorization partners. (p. 4). After hearing that it was unlikely that she would ever make partner, Ann Hopkins decided to drill a lawsuit charging Price Waterhouse with sex discrimination. She had been a rich and productive member of the organization and it appears that she was denied admission as a partner since she did not fit the feminine stereotype. Critical issues LegalThere is demon stration of Intentional Discrimination by Price Waterhouse and its employees based on informal stereotype. Appropriate legal rulesAccording to Corley, Reed, Shedd, and Morehead, (2001) the most important statue eliminating discriminatory craft practices, however, is the federal Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the check Employment Opportunity Act o 1972 and the Civil Rights Act of 1991. The appropriation section o... ... order to examine and evaluate the ethical questions? The assumption that need to be made in analyzing the case are that discriminating against an case-by-case based on a deviation from the certain stereotype for their sexual urge is morally unacceptable. Ethically, what should be done?     Price Waterhouse should initiate its partners and employees about accepted work practices and should institute diversity training in order to educate members that stereotyping is unacceptable. Ann Hopkins should be admitted as partner to the fi rm and welcomed as a worthy addition to senior management. Works CitedCivil Rights Act of 1964. 2 July 1964. U.S. discussion section of State. 12 Sept. 2004.      http//usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/laws/majorlaw/civilr19.htmCivil Rights Act of 1991. 8 March 1991. U.S. section of State. 12 Sept. 2004.      http//usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/laws/majorlaw/civil91.htmHarvard stage business School. Ann Hopkins (A). Boston Harvard Business School Publishing, 1991.Velasquez, Manuel G. (2002) Owen, C., (5th Ed.). Business Ethics Concepts and Cases. Upper Saddle River, NJ Prentice Hall